답변을 얻은 뒤 반드시 감사의 덧글을 남기고, 좋은 답변은 채택해 주시는 센스...
질문할 때 예의를 지키시기 바랍니다.(빨리... 고수분만..... 이런 식의 요구는 자제 바랍니다.)
질문 내용 : IT is better that these political and juridical leanings be known and voted on than that they be concealed thrugh the system of appointment.(should) be known 이라고 하던데, 뒤에 voted on은 어떻게 되는건가요?that they be concealed 도 should가 생략된건가요?해석도 잘 안되고 ㅠㅠㅠ부탁드려요[원문입니다.
It is idealistic and naive to believe that anyone is ever genuinely politically neutral. Every judge will lean towards a certain political view and possess some biases. It is better that these political and juridical leanings be known and voted on than that they be concealed through the system of appointment. In addition, being a judge is a crucially important job ─ judging fairly and firmly based on the laws of the nation. The *incumbent must be answerable to and removable by the people. The job also accompanies power, prestige and influence and like the presidents are elected, the people should have a say in who it is that gets the power and influence. Appointed judges gain power through unaccountable process of networking and politicking and are not answerable to anybody.
*incumbent: 현직자