during the 2008 u.s. presidential election, researcher valdis krebs at orgnet.com analyzed purchasing trends on amazon. people who already supported a candidate were the same people buying books that painted him in a positive light. people who already disliked the candidate were the ones buying books painting him in a negative light. just as with pundits, people weren’t buying books for the information; they were buying them for the confirmation. krebs has researched purchasing trends on amazon and the clustering habits of people on social networks for years, and his research shows what psychological research into confirmation bias predicts: you want to be right about how you see the world, so you seek out information that confirms your beliefs and avoid contradictory evidence and opinions.
이 글에서 just as with pundits, 는 not을 빼고 해석하는 것이 맞는지요? 즉 전문가들은 사람들과 달리information을 위해서 책을 구매한다로 해석하는 것이 맞는지요? 아니면, 사람들,pundits 둘다 정보를 위해 책을 구매하지 않는다가 맞는지요?가르침 부탁드립니다. 답변 미리 감사드립니다. 즐거운 하루 되십시오.