a pet theory of mine is that things should be seen from a distance. seen close-up, things have a way of showing their defects, their innate ugliness. for nothing is so beautiful that it does not betray some defect on close inspection. ...

1. seen close-up, : 왜 여기에선 주어 동사가 없나요 ?? 해석지에 보면 가까이에서 본다면 , ~ 이렇게 해석이 되어
있는데... 이해가 잘 안되네요..ㅜㅠ

2. for : 여기에 for은 왜 써준건가요 ?

문법은 공부해도해도 어려운 것 같아요 .... ㅜㅠ
친절한 설명과 정확한 답변 기다리겠습니다ㅜㅠ