해석이 깔끔하게 안되네요. 좀 부탁드릴게요.
Essentially the same structural forms of politics can nevertheless take on very different “flavors.” For example, a dictatorship can, in theory, be brutal or benevolent; anarchy can, in the in the absence of any rule of law whatsoever; democracies can and typicallory, consist of “mutual aid” or a “war of all against all” that proceedsy are distinguished in terms of the extent to which they are socially oriented as opposed to individualistically oriented. Thus, whatever our answer to the “What is the best structural form of politics?” question, we still want to know what “flavor” this structural form of politics ought to have since political structure, by itself, does not determine political content. Indeed, this is precisely why we vote within a democratic structure: to determine the “flavor” we want that democratic structure to have.
너무 길어 죄송해요.