science assumes that if a belief is valid, its consequences can be replicated or reproduced in nearly identical fashion across occasions, circumstances, or people, and that the phenomena being observed can be recorded independent of their consequences. the entire scientific method is designed to ensure that the conditions of replicability and objectivity are present. in contrast, anecdotal evidence, by its very nature, is inconsistent. basing your life and decisions on anecdotal evidence means ignoring facts when these facts contradict your beliefs. depressed persons may reject the consistent reassurances of a friend that they are lovable and capable. by denying the importance of other opinions, they doom themselves to their own distorted view of the world, and their own bad feelings. they reject important information about themselves that might help them cope with their problems.
전체 내용 자체가 잘 잡히질 않네요. 특히 밑줄 부분에서 these facts 는 어디랑 연결이 되는 건가요?
어려운 용어로 인해저는 내용파악이 안되는 구문인데 멋지게 해석을 잘하시니 정말 대단한 실력입니다. ...그런데 일반동사인데도 Do you agree?가 아니고 Are you agree?가 맞는 표현인가요?