Do you think legal systems should allow self-defense as a partial or total defense to a charge in a criminal case?
Well, typically there is some sort of requirement that the purported act of self-defense bear some proportionate relationship to the act against which it is used.
For this reason, it is often very hard to argue that a murder has taken place in self-defense, since in many jurisdictions this would need to demonstrate that the accused had a real, reasonalbe fear of immediate harm on such a scale that killing was an appropriate response. What kind of limits should there be in self-defense? I hooked up with Sam and Betty, law students in the Universtiy of Waterloo in Canada to address the issue.

부탁드려요~ㅎ