might이 확실하지않은 미래 일때 쓰인다는걸로 알고있는데요,

we find it very hard to say what the gold standard of meaning is, or how we might restore it
we find it very hard to say what the gold standard of meaning is, or how we restore it

두문장은 어떻게 해석차이가 나나요?

정확한 답변 위해서 전문 올려요.
the problems with our talking together do not stem from an absence of words.
we have an excessive multitude of words: more words, less and less meaning.
five-hundred-channel television services, millions of web sites, and an endless stream of opinion from every media source about the latest political or social scandal (a) [race / races] their way to you in a wild contest for your attention.
given so many different perspectives, we lose sight of any common sense we might make of it all.
as a result, (b) [whenever / whatever] gold standard of commonly held and deeply shared meaning
that might have lain beneath our words is scattered and lost. our world is filled with piles of words, many of which are full of sound and fury, (c) [signify / signifying] nothing. perhaps more critically, we find it very hard to say what the gold standard of meaning is, or how we might restore it.