메뉴 건너뛰기


답변을 얻은 뒤 반드시 감사의 덧글을 남기고, 좋은 답변은 채택해 주시는 센스...
질문할 때 예의를 지키시기 바랍니다.(빨리... 고수분만..... 이런 식의 요구는 자제 바랍니다.)
질문 내용 :

뉴욕타임즈 기사입니다 해석을 하는데 난해한 부분이 너무 많아서요 ㅠㅠ 해석좀부탁드릴게요 ㅠㅠ우선 이글은 오바마대통령의 미국보건의료개혁법에 관한 내용이에요.
혹시 단락만 뽑아서 적으면 무슨 내용인지 이해를 잘 못하실까봐 기사전체를 올립니다.빨간글자부분을 해석좀해주세요 ㅠㅠ 부탁드립니다 ㅠㅠ(전체다해주시면 정말 감사드리구요 ㅠㅠ)그리고 여기서 relief의 의미가 어떤것으로 쓰였는지 모르겠어요 완화인지, 규제인지.. 알려주세요 ㅠㅠSometimes lost in the partisan clamor about the new health care law is the profound relief it is expected to bring to hundreds of thousands of Americans who have been stricken first by disease and then by a Darwinian insurance system.On Thursday, the six-month anniversary of the signing of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, a number of its most central consumer protections take effect, just in time for the midterm elections. Starting now, insurance companies will no longer be permitted to exclude children because of pre-existing health conditions, which the White House said could enable 72,000 uninsured to gain coverage. Insurers also will be prohibited from imposing lifetime limits on benefits. The law will now forbid insurers to drop sick and costly customers after discovering technical mistakes on applications. It requires that they offer coverage to children under 26 on their parents’ policies. It establishes a menu of preventive procedures, like colonoscopies, mammograms and immunizations, that must be covered without co-payments. And it allows consumers who join a new plan to keep their own doctors and to appeal insurance company reimbursement decisions to a third party. The arrival of the long-awaited changes propelled President Obama, whose Democrats have struggled to exploit their signature achievement, into the backyard of Paul and Frances Brayshaw of Falls Church, Va., to explain his decision to pursue health care. “The amount of vulnerability that was out there was horrendous,” Mr. Obama on Wednesday told a gathering of people chosen to illustrate the law’s new provisions. He said he concluded that “we’ve just got to give people some basic peace of mind.” Mr. Obama also responded to Republican Congressional leaders who have campaigned on a threat to repeal the act. “I want them to look you in the eye,” he told his audience, and explain their opposition to a law that is projected to cover 32 million uninsured and reduce the deficit by $143 billion over 10 years. The Republican strategy “makes sense in terms of politics and polls,” Mr. Obama said, an acknowledgment that the electorate is divided and that many swing districts are hostile. “It just doesn’t make sense in terms of actually making people’s lives better.” House Republicans continued to question Mr. Obama’s assertions, which he repeated Wednesday, that the law will lower premiums, pointing to double-digit increases recently announced by many insurers. A blog posting on the Web site of the minority leader, Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, predicted the law would “raise health care costs, explode the federal deficit and create a byzantine bureaucracy.” The administration has estimated that premiums should rise no more than 2 percent because of the new consumer protections, and warned this month that it would have “zero tolerance” for efforts to blame the law for larger increases. It will take years to determine the act’s long-term impact on American health, and on American politics. But Democrats did manage to front-load some notable benefits, while deferring the pain of tax increases and penalties until after the election. Polls have found that many of the provisions taking effect Thursday are popular, tugging at a national sense of fairness and feeding off distrust of health insurers. They bear particular appeal for the 14 million people who must buy policies on the individual market rather than through employers and are thus at the mercy of the industry. And they land on the heels of a government report showing that the recession drove the number of uninsured Americans to 50.7 million in 2009, up 10 percent in a year. As the political battle endures, those most immediately affected are welcoming the changes with collective relief, and hoping that their promise of security is real.

번호 제목 글쓴이 날짜
157051 이 한문장 어떻게 해석할까요? new 반혈 2025.06.12
157050 후방범퍼교체할때 후방센세를 순정으로? new 권시크 2025.06.12
157049 잘못된단어좀찾아주세요 ㅠㅠㅠ 제발 new 아이돌 2025.06.12
157048 전치사 for의 목적어? new 뿡뿡 2025.06.11
157047 후방 댓글렉터 제거 방법 문의입니다. 벚꽃 2025.06.11
157046 if의 해석 ~인지아닌지?? 만약 ~라면 둘다해도 안되는문장은 어덯게 해야하나요 연블랙 2025.06.11
157045 영어독해 해석부탁드려요 이슬비 2025.06.11
157044 영어숙어 혜린 2025.06.11
157043 실내LED 교체후 사랑은아픔 2025.06.11
157042 형식질문입니다. 가시 2025.06.11
157041 관계부사 where에 관한 궁금중이요 월식 2025.06.11
157040 자동사에 전치사사용대해.. 조히 2025.06.11
157039 동사의 문형! 맨삶이 2025.06.10
157038 도치 질문이요 대기중 엘핀 2025.06.10
157037 브레이크등 질문입니다. 엄마몬 2025.06.10
157036 조수석 창문 질문이요~ 나리 2025.06.10
157035 관계부사 where 질문입니당 ^^ 아리 2025.06.10
157034 면발광리어램프 포그램프 주간등 유진 2025.06.10
157033 Something is the case 뜻? 파이팅 2025.06.10
157032 would yoy mind repeating 곰돌곰돌 2025.06.10
157031 차이점좀 알려주세요~ 지음 2025.06.09
157030 한가지 더 해봅니다 구어체인거 같은데 야미 2025.06.09
157029 안녕하세요. 도치에 관해서 여쭤볼게요. ^^ 파도 2025.06.09
157028 부사위치 DevilsTears 2025.06.09
157027 이문장 질문좀 할꼐요. 푸우 2025.06.09
157026 한문장 해석이 안되요....도와주세요^^ 슬예 2025.06.09
157025 실내 튜닝에 관해서 궁금합니다 .. 꽃바라기슬아 2025.06.09
157024 it that 강조 vs 관계사 역곡중 2025.06.09
157023 It is certain to 부정사 (사용불가) 큰아 2025.06.09
157022 문장 형식 질문드립니다! 물보라 2025.06.08
157021 문장구조와 해석 도움 부탁이요~~ 월향 2025.06.08
157020 번호판등 가는방법좀 알려주세요~~~ Judicious 2025.06.08
157019 저렙의 난독해] 해석 좀 부탁드립니다. 한울 2025.06.08
157018 in which 질문.. 급해요 ㅠㅠ 에일린 2025.06.08
157017 I would love to live 와 I love to live 의 차이점?? agine 2025.06.08
157016 밑줄 친 문장 구조,해석 부탁드려요.. 진이 2025.06.08
157015 the way= how? 머슴밥 2025.06.08
157014 lots of / a lot of 콘라드 2025.06.08
157013 완 전 짧아요 ㅠㅠ 도와주세요 ㅠㅠ 기초!! 단순랩퍼 2025.06.07
157012 cost 의 수동태 문제인데요...꼭 부탁드립니다.. 역곡중 2025.06.07
2022-02-21 20:12:49
여행오키 | 사업자 등록번호 : 109-86-27241 | 관리 책임자 : 명현재
주소 : 서울시 강서구 화곡동 786-9 탑건 302호 | 문의 : kjs8907@nate.com